Today was our first experience at Dora Nginza hospital, another public sector facility with about 500 beds. Dora focuses mainly on pediatrics patients, but they also have an extensive burn unit (because of the high fire rates in the townships). Compared to Livingstone, its a palace. Even though its still within in the public sector, the facility is newer, less chaotic, and there are fewer people roaming the halls (most likely due to the high pediatric patient population). From one day in the hospital, we can already tell that the nursing staff and the doctors are more willing to work with us. And it seems much more sanitary than Livingstone hospital. In fact, you MUST wear the specialized tuberculosis-proof face masks when on the general medicine wards, because they have "a higher rate of TB" than Livingstone, although they do manage to have their drug resistant TB patients in isolation, which doesn't happen at Livingstone. Its both worrisome and encouraging that the masks are required (what have we already been exposed to vs. available precautions at this hospital). That being said, none of the students that have done this rotation have come back with a positive tuberculosis skin test, so the risk is low..but still, its concerning.
Since rounds were not organized today with the pediatric attending, we spent a long time talking to another Pharm. D. candidate from Rhodes University (already has a B.S. in pharmacy) about the cultural aspects of South Africa. Despite what we've been thrown into already, we surprisingly weren't given a cultural introduction at the start of the rotation.
Lets start with the basics. We've heard a lot of terms since we got here about race...black, African, coloured, white. Of course with our American history, we think of "coloured" as being black (knowing, obviously that the term's use is not accepted anymore); so we needed some clarification. So black is traditional, full blooded African descendants of the original inhabitants of South Africa (like Bushmen, for example). White is of Dutch or British decent. Coloured is any one who is "mixed race," and is a very accepted term, not having the negative stigma that it has in the states. Apart from patients telling you that they are one or the other, there's no real way to tell. And guessing can be dangerous, since Xhosa and Zulu populations are "at odds" as you could say, so mistaking a Zulu for a Xhosa could be offensive. Coloureds and blacks often live in their own, separate neighborhoods, the townships being mainly black populations. "African" terminology is difficult, however. Often times it seems that only the black communities are referred to as "African" because of their ancestry. But then sometimes its referred to coloured or black people. From my perspective, it seems like the definition varies from person to person, but that's just conjecture (also, aren't they all Africans???). Xhosa is the language predominately in the black population, where as Afrikaans is more common in the coloured and white populations.
I feel its important to make these distinctions, because its easy to inappropriately extrapolate our own cultural characteristics onto their population. They even do it to a degree. For instance, certain drugs and American trials detect different efficacies or side effects in African-Americans versus Caucasians. They extrapolate the findings in the African-American populations to their African population (and whether that's every one or just the "black" population, I'm not sure). This could be completely inappropriate, as I can imagine the genetic make-up of our black population to be very different from theirs. Who's to say that the genetic make up of Kenyan's is the same as South Africans or Namibians? Its seems like an even further stretch to say that those who have been in the Americas for generations would still have similar genetic influences that change how they react to drugs. Anywho, their reasoning behind extrapolating the evidence is because it is unreasonable to believe or expect there to be major drug trials in South African populations due to costs (and in the interest of "where to spend the money, SA or America"). It is understandable, but just highlights another way South Africans are disadvantaged.
Education remains a major inconsistency throughout the population. Prior to the transition form the apartheid regime to the democratic system in 1990, most coloured and blacks were not allowed to attend school. There were schools for them, which of course would have been separate from whites, but it was not common. So now we stand 18 years out from the full transition from apartheid, which means that only those about 18 or younger have received primary and secondary education. Most of our patients are older than that, meaning their education level is minimal. They are most likely illiterate, not being able to read English or their native Xhosa. What's even more hindering is that all children have to pay to attend primary and secondary school (elementary and high school). So families have to make a choice, pay for kids to attend school or have them work to provide for the family. This is probably the reason you can see so many children begging in the streets instead of going to school (we were told they're learning to grow up as beggars instead of productive citizens...).
With illiteracy also comes health illiteracy, which can help to explain the high rates of HIV seen here. Many things are written in English, and if patients can't read Xhosa, let alone English, its easy to get confused. Another complication is that there are many Cuban doctors here, meaning that the only language they can speak in English; patients often time just plain don't understand their doctors. Cultural beliefs also come into play and are barriers to care. For instance, in Xhosa culture polygamy is common and condoms are seen as "unmanly." Also, traditional healers believe epilepsy can be "beaten" out of someone; or diabetes is a result of something getting spread around your house, and that you stepping over it causes diabetes, which can be healed by a shaman of sorts (I forget their name for it).
The most dangerous cultural belief I had heard of before coming to Africa, but I was under the impression that it was only in small African tribes and not a widespread issue. Many natives believe that having sex with a virgin or a baby can cure HIV. This is why South Africa, and especially townships, have such high rates of rape. Its unimaginable that these beliefs still hold true in today's society, and they compound the other health literacy issues at hand.
Even the government plays a part; HIV patients are given a stipend from the government for health care related costs (appointments, trips to pharmacies, etc). The stipend is dependent on whats called a CD4 count. Let me explain-- the CD4 count is a measure of the immune system destruction in HIV. The lower the number, the more likely the patients are to get opportunistic infections, which very frequently lead to fatal complications. The higher the number, the healthier the patient is. HIV medications, if working effectively, will increase this number. When CD4 counts are less than 200, 100 or 50, the patient is at a much higher risk for serious infections, and their medication and medical care burdens are higher. What the government has done is give patients with a CD4 count less than 200 a monetary stipend. Once the CD4 count goes above 200 (i.e. the patient is healthier), the stipend is revoked. So for patients that are very impoverished, as the majority of the population is, there is essentially a benefit to stay sicker. I believe this can relate to the US when people have schizophrenia or other mental conditions, or when children qualify as special education, they receive funds from the government. While its use is to improve the lives of those who are more disadvantaged, often the reality is contradictory to the patient's health, education, or mental well being.
Its easy for us to try and suggest ways to improve the transmission rates of HIV, get patients be compliant with their medications, or have them come to their follow up appointments, but with a culture as diverse, complicated and hindered as this population is, its impossible to start from the health care system. Change needs to happen from primary school into adulthood. Only when the stigmas and taboos about HIV are abolished at a very young age, starting in primary school and continuing into adulthood, can South Africa attempt to make any leeway on their battle against the disease and its devastating effects on its population.
Its easy for us to try and suggest ways to improve the transmission rates of HIV, get patients be compliant with their medications, or have them come to their follow up appointments, but with a culture as diverse, complicated and hindered as this population is, its impossible to start from the health care system. Change needs to happen from primary school into adulthood. Only when the stigmas and taboos about HIV are abolished at a very young age, starting in primary school and continuing into adulthood, can South Africa attempt to make any leeway on their battle against the disease and its devastating effects on its population.















